<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Our New Favorite Portmanteau: WSJ&#8217;s &#8220;Obamanomics&#8221;</title>
	<link>http://obamarama.org/2007/04/24/our-new-favorite-portmanteau-wsjs-obamanomics/</link>
	<description>Let's get this Party started</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 17:05:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: JHC</title>
		<link>http://obamarama.org/2007/04/24/our-new-favorite-portmanteau-wsjs-obamanomics/#comment-3579</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 20:34:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://obamarama.org/2007/04/24/our-new-favorite-portmanteau-wsjs-obamanomics/#comment-3579</guid>
					<description>Good point Riley.  My sense is that Edwards is running the campaign this time around that he wished he had run in 2004.  I think he really is to the left of Obama on a lot of issues, especially labor.  I don't think the populism is an act for him.

I also don't think it's enough to put him over the top, which is good because I also think it would hurt him in the general.  In this sense, I like Obama's positioning because it's liberal enough for the primary, but mainstream enough for the general election.  He's walking the middle path, and I think it will pay off for him, and us, in time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point Riley.  My sense is that Edwards is running the campaign this time around that he wished he had run in 2004.  I think he really is to the left of Obama on a lot of issues, especially labor.  I don&#8217;t think the populism is an act for him.</p>
<p>I also don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s enough to put him over the top, which is good because I also think it would hurt him in the general.  In this sense, I like Obama&#8217;s positioning because it&#8217;s liberal enough for the primary, but mainstream enough for the general election.  He&#8217;s walking the middle path, and I think it will pay off for him, and us, in time.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Riley</title>
		<link>http://obamarama.org/2007/04/24/our-new-favorite-portmanteau-wsjs-obamanomics/#comment-3574</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 19:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://obamarama.org/2007/04/24/our-new-favorite-portmanteau-wsjs-obamanomics/#comment-3574</guid>
					<description>Is Edwards to the left of Obama, or is he using the advantage of not being in office to *run* to the left of Obama? The last time I checked, Edwards was still on the DLC roster. Isn't that the litmus test of a progressive Democrat?

There's no question that Edwards' rhetoric draws on a populist vein that is foreign to the DLC. But it would be suiced to run a DLC/centrist campaign. Hillary owns that turf. Just ask Joe Biden, wherever he is.

Edwards strategy to paint himself as the firebreathing true-believing progressive among the candidates seems to be convincing a lot of people. But it's at odds with his record. And it's *awfully* convenient.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is Edwards to the left of Obama, or is he using the advantage of not being in office to *run* to the left of Obama? The last time I checked, Edwards was still on the DLC roster. Isn&#8217;t that the litmus test of a progressive Democrat?</p>
<p>There&#8217;s no question that Edwards&#8217; rhetoric draws on a populist vein that is foreign to the DLC. But it would be suiced to run a DLC/centrist campaign. Hillary owns that turf. Just ask Joe Biden, wherever he is.</p>
<p>Edwards strategy to paint himself as the firebreathing true-believing progressive among the candidates seems to be convincing a lot of people. But it&#8217;s at odds with his record. And it&#8217;s *awfully* convenient.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
