<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On Obama&#8217;s Japanese Mileage Non-Mistake, Conservative Bloggers Seem Content to Leave Foot in Mouth</title>
	<link>http://obamarama.org/2007/05/12/on-obamas-japanese-mileage-non-mistake-conservative-bloggers-seem-content-to-leave-foot-in-mouth/</link>
	<description>Let's get this Party started</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 17:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Mike</title>
		<link>http://obamarama.org/2007/05/12/on-obamas-japanese-mileage-non-mistake-conservative-bloggers-seem-content-to-leave-foot-in-mouth/#comment-4807</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 14:50:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://obamarama.org/2007/05/12/on-obamas-japanese-mileage-non-mistake-conservative-bloggers-seem-content-to-leave-foot-in-mouth/#comment-4807</guid>
					<description>They also got it wrong on his response to 1an attack on America' question during the democratic debate in SC.

I'm a conservative republican, and naturally, I was very curious to read about Obama's response to the question on his reaction in case of an attack on America, partly because the media claimed it was the weakest answer and differed from the other candidates.

Boy, did they get it wrong?

Obama's response actually showed better judgment in a time of crisis than all the other candidates whose responses where nothing short of typical republican big-mouth, tough-talk, arrogance.  Who exactly will they 'strike, 'kill' or 'retaliate' against? That's why we went to Iraq instead of going after Bin Laden. And while they're busy 'striking', 'killing' or 'retaliating' who looks after the devastation back home?

This country needs a sound head like Barack Obama, who can make reasoned judgements and decisions. Not 'striking', 'killing', 'retaliating', tough-talking', ruthless, uncompasionate, money-hungry, power-hungry. over-ambitious politicians.

I'm an ardent republican and conservative. But none of the current republican candidates have the one thing that attracted me to George Bush. I hope people like Stephen Baldwin, Bishop TD Jakes, John Hagee, Mathew Dowd would publicly endorse Obama.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They also got it wrong on his response to 1an attack on America&#8217; question during the democratic debate in SC.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a conservative republican, and naturally, I was very curious to read about Obama&#8217;s response to the question on his reaction in case of an attack on America, partly because the media claimed it was the weakest answer and differed from the other candidates.</p>
<p>Boy, did they get it wrong?</p>
<p>Obama&#8217;s response actually showed better judgment in a time of crisis than all the other candidates whose responses where nothing short of typical republican big-mouth, tough-talk, arrogance.  Who exactly will they &#8217;strike, &#8216;kill&#8217; or &#8216;retaliate&#8217; against? That&#8217;s why we went to Iraq instead of going after Bin Laden. And while they&#8217;re busy &#8217;striking&#8217;, &#8216;killing&#8217; or &#8216;retaliating&#8217; who looks after the devastation back home?</p>
<p>This country needs a sound head like Barack Obama, who can make reasoned judgements and decisions. Not &#8217;striking&#8217;, &#8216;killing&#8217;, &#8216;retaliating&#8217;, tough-talking&#8217;, ruthless, uncompasionate, money-hungry, power-hungry. over-ambitious politicians.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m an ardent republican and conservative. But none of the current republican candidates have the one thing that attracted me to George Bush. I hope people like Stephen Baldwin, Bishop TD Jakes, John Hagee, Mathew Dowd would publicly endorse Obama.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
